| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 22:11:44 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:27:35PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Guido Guenther wrote: [..snip..] > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32). > > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem. I think 64 is o64 not n64. > > gcc-3.2 doesn't seem > > to handle these options correctly at all. > > AFAICS you can still drop the -mtune part. Yes, thanks for pointing this out. I'm just leaving this in the Makefile to know what to change if I want to tune for another cpu. -- Guido |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |