linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
From: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 22:11:44 +0200
In-reply-to: <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Mail-followup-to: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:27:35PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Guido Guenther wrote:
[..snip..] 
> > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32).
> 
> Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem.
I think 64 is o64 not n64.

> > gcc-3.2 doesn't seem
> > to handle these options correctly at all.
> 
> AFAICS you can still drop the -mtune part.
Yes, thanks for pointing this out. I'm just leaving this in the Makefile
to know what to change if I want to tune for another cpu.
 -- Guido

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>