| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 21:27:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
Guido Guenther wrote: [snip] > > > So to build kernels for say IP22 R5k I'd change the current > > > GCCFLAGS += -mcpu=r5000 -mips2 -Wa,--trap > > > to > > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=o32 -march=R5000 -mtune=R5000 -Wa,--trap > > > where as for R4X00 I use > > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=o32 -march=R4600 -mtune=R4600 -Wa,--trap > > > Correct? > > > > Yes, this should work. You can leave the -mtune out, since it defaults > > to the value of -march anyway. > Just for completeness: I had to use: > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=32 -march=r4600 -mtune=r4600 -Wa,--trap > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32). Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem. > gcc-3.2 doesn't seem > to handle these options correctly at all. AFAICS you can still drop the -mtune part. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: memory for exception vectors, Ladislav Michl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |