Should we try this binutils-184.108.40.206.20?
We try the version binutils-220.127.116.11.18 (Debian used) and it is failed on
cross-gcc step :-(
Thanks and best regards,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kumba" <email@example.com>
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X
> Oddly enough, I followed these basic steps and wound up with a working
> cross-compiler from sparc64 -> mipseb (Sun Blade 100 to mips
> big-endian). Gcc nor glibc gave me any issues.....However, when I tried
> the same exact steps on i686, glibc complained about libgcc not being
> available, among other things. It's got me baffled, but I'm not exactly
> complaining. Currently, it's gcc-3.2.3 (propolice patched) +
> glibc-2.3.2 + binutils-18.104.22.168.20, which it'll get rebuilt for the new
> binutils 2.14.
> Eric Christopher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 19:05, smills_ho wrote:
> >>Dear All,
> >> I want to make a cross-compilered glibc-2.3.x and I get the source
> >>ftp.gun.org. GCC version is 3.2.3, binutils is 22.214.171.124. The step is as
> >>1. Try to build binutils
> >>2. Try to make static GCC
> >>3. Try to make glibc -----> Then it is failed
> >>Is there anybody know what's going on or somebody had successfully to
> >>the crossed glibc-2.3.x?
> > A host cross host compiler for linux systems is a little more involved
> > than this :)
> > However, I don't know where you went wrong since you really didn't
> > provide much in the way of information as to what you did or where it
> > failed.
> > -eric