| To: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:07:27 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Baitis <baitisj@evolution.com>, Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Matthew Dharm <mdharm@momenco.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030422155625.E28544@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:56:25PM -0700 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030422125450.E10148@luca.pas.lab> <20030422155625.E28544@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:56:25PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote: > I think this is a good example to show benefit of code sharing. > There is no good reason for au1x00 boards of not using new time.c. > You get to write less board code, fewer bugs and future proof. There are just three configurations left using CONFIG_OLD_TIME_C: - EV64120 which I guess can be considered abandonded - Momenco Ocelot (Matthew, feel like you have time to take care of this?) - RM200 (semi-maintained, my turn to fix it ...) Seems like it's time to get rid of CONFIG_OLD_TIME_C. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Dan Malek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Jun Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |