| To: | Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:07:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | Jeff Baitis <baitisj@evolution.com>, Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, jsun@mvista.com |
| In-reply-to: | <1051052439.2552.352.camel@zeus.mvista.com>; from ppopov@mvista.com on Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:00:39PM -0700 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030422125450.E10148@luca.pas.lab> <20030422155625.E28544@mvista.com> <1051052439.2552.352.camel@zeus.mvista.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:00:39PM -0700, Pete Popov wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 15:56, Jun Sun wrote: > > I think this is a good example to show benefit of code sharing. > > There is no good reason for au1x00 boards of not using new time.c. > > You get to write less board code, fewer bugs and future proof. > > The I didn't use the generic time.c back then is power management. Oh, I see. My ignorance ... :) > The > CP0 counter sleeps when using the 'wait' instruction, so in that case > you have to use a different counter with a rather poor resolution. The > modifications I had to make were such that they couldn't go in the > generic time.c. But that area definitely needs to be revisited and > cleaned up. > Yeah, there might be something interesting to do here. Jun |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ide_ops issues for big endian mips, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Pete Popov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Improperly handled case in arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c, Dan Malek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |