On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 15:56, Jun Sun wrote:
> I think this is a good example to show benefit of code sharing.
> There is no good reason for au1x00 boards of not using new time.c.
> You get to write less board code, fewer bugs and future proof.
The I didn't use the generic time.c back then is power management. The
CP0 counter sleeps when using the 'wait' instruction, so in that case
you have to use a different counter with a rather poor resolution. The
modifications I had to make were such that they couldn't go in the
generic time.c. But that area definitely needs to be revisited and
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:54:50PM -0700, Jeff Baitis wrote:
> > Pete:
> > While struggling to get Linux up on Evolution's custom board based on the
> > Au1500, I discovered a poorly handled case in time.c; null interrupts are
> > handled should not affect the local IRQ count. (if the local IRQ count is
> > not
> > decremented, tests for in_irq() fail.)
> > Thanks for taking a look at my patch!
> > -Jeff
> > Index: time.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/au1000/common/time.c,v
> > retrieving revision 184.108.40.206
> > diff -u -r220.127.116.11 time.c
> > --- time.c 25 Mar 2003 14:30:19 -0000 18.104.22.168
> > +++ time.c 22 Apr 2003 19:47:24 -0000
> > @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
> > return;
> > null:
> > + irq_exit(cpu, irq);
> > ack_r4ktimer(0);
> > }