| To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] TANBAC TB0226(NEC VR4131) for v2.5 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:00:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>, Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.21.0304221338360.16017-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:40:19PM +0200 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030422133642.A15285@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0304221338360.16017-100000@vervain.sonytel.be> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:40:19PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I don't think there's much point in using ISO style initializers everywhere. > > So far the convention is only to replace the GNU-style inializer. > > We unfortunately have a few places where the code got inflated by at least > > the factor of 3 because now some code uses the ISO initializers for > > everything - for no good reason. > > What if someone will change struct resource in the future? For the generic case that concern may be true - but I don't think struct resource will change any time soon. Imagine fixing all the drivers ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] TANBAC TB0226(NEC VR4131) for v2.5, Geert Uytterhoeven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] TANBAC TB0226(NEC VR4131) for v2.5, Juan Quintela |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] TANBAC TB0226(NEC VR4131) for v2.5, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] TANBAC TB0226(NEC VR4131) for v2.5, Juan Quintela |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |