| To: | Dennis Castleman <DennisCastleman@oaktech.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: your mail |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:17:10 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jsun@mvista.com |
| In-reply-to: | <56BEF0DBC8B9D611BFDB00508B5E2634102F10@TLEXMAIL>; from DennisCastleman@oaktech.com on Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:53:57AM -0700 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <56BEF0DBC8B9D611BFDB00508B5E2634102F10@TLEXMAIL> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:53:57AM -0700, Dennis Castleman wrote: > ALL > > Anybody know the performance differences I can expect using a MIPS 5K core > @250 Mhz in 64bit mode versus 32bit mode? > It really depends on the applications. The biggest gain from 64bit, other than the obviously bigger address space, is 64bit data manipulation. A single 64bit instruction (add/sub/...) is carried out by several instructions in 32bit. If your apps are heavy on 64bit operations, then you gain. Otherwise I suspect no performance gain or even possibly a little worse performance due more stress on cache/memory subsystems. I am sure others with more 64bit experience probably have more to say. :) Jun |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [no subject], Dennis Castleman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What is .MIPS.options ELF section?, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | [no subject], Dennis Castleman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: your mail, Greg Lindahl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |