| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:16:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
Guido Guenther wrote: [snip] > > -march=BAR: > > Allow opcodes for CPU BAR in addition to the ISA ones. > > > > -mtune=BAZ: > > Optimize opcode scheduling for CPU BAZ. > So to build kernels for say IP22 R5k I'd change the current > GCCFLAGS += -mcpu=r5000 -mips2 -Wa,--trap > to > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=o32 -march=R5000 -mtune=R5000 -Wa,--trap > where as for R4X00 I use > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=o32 -march=R4600 -mtune=R4600 -Wa,--trap > Correct? Yes, this should work. You can leave the -mtune out, since it defaults to the value of -march anyway. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |