| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:03:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
Guido Guenther wrote: > Hi, > it seems newer binutils doen't know about -mcpu anymore. Is it correct > to simply change: > -mcpu=r5000 -mips2 -Wa,--trap > to > -mtune=r5000 -mips2 -Wa,--trap On newer toolchains this will select r6000 opcodes with r5000 scheduling. Try -mabi=o32 -march=r5000 -Wa,--trap This may fail if the compiler is very old, though. > for IP22? -mips2 conflicts with -march=r5000 since this implies -mips4. This was fixed in very recent gcc. -mips2 should be an alias for -march=r6000 and -mips4 one for -march=r8000. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.20 SCSI problems on NASRaQ, Neurophyre |
| Previous by Thread: | -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |