|To:||Jun Sun <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: Mycable XXS board|
|From:||Dan Malek <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Fri, 07 Mar 2003 16:54:28 -0500|
|Cc:||Bruno Randolf <email@example.com>, Alexander Popov <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com|
|Organization:||Embedded Edge, LLC.|
|References:||<3E689267.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20030307101354.N26071@mvista.com> <3E68FD21.email@example.com> <20030307133919.P26071@mvista.com>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020411|
Jun Sun wrote:
I have seen USB working under BE mode in many instances. (Acutally that I have two that work.). I don't think endianess is the issue.
Guess I wasn't clear :-) That comment was directed toward the on-chip peripheral version of the USB controller.
Of course, I have only dealt with PCI USB controllers. On-chip ones may have another set of additional issues that I am not aware of.
That's what I wanted to clarify. Are we discussing one of the on-chip peripheral USB controllers of the Au1xxx, or is it a PCI USB controller that was plugged into the Au1500. In the case of the on-chip controller, there aren't any interrupt routing problems, it's identical (and the same code) on all Au1xxx boards. Thanks. -- Dan
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|