linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] bogus ramdisk sanity check on ip27

To: Andrew Clausen <clausen@melbourne.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] bogus ramdisk sanity check on ip27
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 04:12:42 +0100
Cc: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <20030220003839.GF915@pureza.melbourne.sgi.com>; from clausen@melbourne.sgi.com on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +1100
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20030220003839.GF915@pureza.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:

> There is currently a check that the ramdisk image resides at a sane
> memory address, below "max_pfn".  However, max_pfn isn't initialized
> (and apparently isn't relevant) for ip27.  The only assignments to
> max_pfn lie inside #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_IP27.
> 
> Therefore, this test is bogus, so here's a patch to
> #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_IP27 it.
> 
> This patch applies cleanly on 2.4.x and 2.5.x (at a different offset).

No winner in a beauty contest but I think it's ok until we sort the
underlying NUMA issues which we'd have to do anyway at some point -
more ccNUMA stuff will come eventually ...

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>