| To: | Brian Murphy <brian@murphy.dk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] allow CROSS_COMPILE override |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:23:00 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jsun@mvista.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3E55455A.8080403@murphy.dk>; from brian@murphy.dk on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:15:06PM +0100 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030220124703.H7466@mvista.com> <3E55455A.8080403@murphy.dk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
Is this allowed? Can't find any such usage in kernel other than the worrisome comment below: arch/arm/Makefile:# Grr, ?= doesn't work as all the other assignment operators do. Make bug? Jun On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:15:06PM +0100, Brian Murphy wrote: > Jun Sun wrote: > > >Anybody would object this? It allows one to override > > > Why not but this is less messy: > > --- arch/mips/Makefile 13 Dec 2002 23:41:09 -0000 1.1.1.8 > +++ arch/mips/Makefile 20 Feb 2003 21:10:30 -0000 > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ > endif > > ifdef CONFIG_CROSSCOMPILE > -CROSS_COMPILE = $(tool-prefix) > +CROSS_COMPILE ?= $(tool-prefix) > endif > > # > > /Brian > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] allow CROSS_COMPILE override, Brian Murphy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ramdisk image on flash., Dan Malek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] allow CROSS_COMPILE override, Brian Murphy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] allow CROSS_COMPILE override, Brian Murphy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |