| To: | Long Li <long21st@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Possible bug in gcc for mips? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:12:56 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20030129031421.89385.qmail@web40408.mail.yahoo.com>; from long21st@yahoo.com on Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:14:21PM -0800 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030129031421.89385.qmail@web40408.mail.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:14:21PM -0800, Long Li wrote:
> Subject: Possible bug in gcc for mips?
It's always possible to blame the tools for broken source.
> asm volatile ("mfc0 %0,$12" :: "r"(status_reg));
Make that:
asm volatile ("mfc0 %0,$12" : "=r"(status_reg));
> Is this a possible bug or a feature for gcc 3.0.4?
Yes. Broken source in, broken code out :-)
Ralf
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: unaligned load in branch delay slot, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC & PATCH] fixing tlb flush race problem on smp, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Possible bug in gcc for mips?, Long Li |
| Next by Thread: | XFree XZ support, Skippie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |