Re: sigset_t32 broken?

[Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>]

>>>>> "geert" == Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:

geert> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Vivien Chappelier wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> > Most of what your patch does is undoing an accidental commit of a signal
>> > rework that wasn't yet supposed to go out.
>> 
>> Maybe.. but current version is still wrong :) The type of the sig
>> array in the 32-bit compatibility struct sigset_t32 must be 32bit long,
>> i.e. unsigned int not unsigned long.
>> And I think unsigned describes the data better than signed, but that's a
>> matter of taste :) (coherent with the choice in asm-mips/signal.h).

geert> Why not make it u32?

Nahh, that will make it clear indeed to stupid's like me :p

Later ,Juan.



-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy