| To: | Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: insmod failure: "Unhandled relocation" errors |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:24:47 +0100 |
| Cc: | Gilad Benjamini <gilad@riverhead.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <9030.1042587273@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:34:33AM +1100 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <001801c2bbb4$a6177de0$7100000a@riverhead.com> <9030.1042587273@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:34:33AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > modutils needs obj/obj_mips64.c. The config and makefiles have to be > tweaked to handle mips64, including combined 32/64 bit code, as for > sparc32/sparc64. Does anybody who knows mips64 feel like contributing > the modutils code? Until recently the big problem with implementing modules support for mips64 was the complete unusability of binutils. Compared to the complexity of getting binutils to work what it takes to get modutils to work is plain trivial ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: insmod failure: "Unhandled relocation" errors, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MOPD, Justin Pauley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: insmod failure: "Unhandled relocation" errors, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | malta-5kc, amit lubovsky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |