linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: insmod failure: "Unhandled relocation" errors

To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Subject: Re: insmod failure: "Unhandled relocation" errors
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:24:47 +0100
Cc: Gilad Benjamini <gilad@riverhead.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <9030.1042587273@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:34:33AM +1100
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <001801c2bbb4$a6177de0$7100000a@riverhead.com> <9030.1042587273@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:34:33AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:

> modutils needs obj/obj_mips64.c.  The config and makefiles have to be
> tweaked to handle mips64, including combined 32/64 bit code, as for
> sparc32/sparc64.  Does anybody who knows mips64 feel like contributing
> the modutils code?

Until recently the big problem with implementing modules support for mips64
was the complete unusability of binutils.  Compared to the complexity of
getting binutils to work what it takes to get modutils to work is plain
trivial ...

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>