linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH]: %p and 0 pad is not C99

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, mipslist <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: [PATCH]: %p and 0 pad is not C99
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2002 12:03:34 +0100
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Hi
        compiler complains when you use %08p about the %0, notice that
        this came (normally) from somebody changing %08x to this, with
        %x the 0 is valid.

Later, Juan.

Index: arch/mips/lib/dump_tlb.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/lib/dump_tlb.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8.2.6
diff -u -r1.8.2.6 dump_tlb.c
--- arch/mips/lib/dump_tlb.c    18 Dec 2002 22:47:37 -0000      1.8.2.6
+++ arch/mips/lib/dump_tlb.c    19 Dec 2002 10:38:02 -0000
@@ -153,8 +154,8 @@
        addr = (unsigned int) address;
 
        printk("Addr                 == %08x\n", addr);
-       printk("task                 == %08p\n", t);
-       printk("task->mm             == %08p\n", t->mm);
+       printk("task                 == %8p\n", t);
+       printk("task->mm             == %8p\n", t->mm);
        //printk("tasks->mm.pgd        == %08x\n", (unsigned int) t->mm->pgd);
 
        if (addr > KSEG0)


-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [PATCH]: %p and 0 pad is not C99, Juan Quintela <=