linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels

To: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:27:12 +0100
Cc: linux mips mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <m2k7i7nf6b.fsf@demo.mitica>; from quintela@mandrakesoft.com on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:19:24PM +0100
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <m2bs3kqez8.fsf@demo.mitica> <20021218225715.A32351@linux-mips.org> <m2k7i7nf6b.fsf@demo.mitica>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:19:24PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:

> ralf> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:43:07AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> patch is trivial to eliminate warnings from the compiler
> 
> ralf> And yet I didn't like it.  The new syntax requirement isn't only ugly 
> code,
> ralf> it's harder to read than a replacing the gotos with a simple return ...
> 
> I thought that the gotos to end was there for generation of code
> reasons.

Doesn't make a code difference in this case for MIPS.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>