linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:57:15 +0100
Cc: linux mips mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <m2bs3kqez8.fsf@demo.mitica>; from quintela@mandrakesoft.com on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:43:07AM +0100
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <m2bs3kqez8.fsf@demo.mitica>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i 
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:43:07AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:

>         patch is trivial to eliminate warnings from the compiler

And yet I didn't like it.  The new syntax requirement isn't only ugly code,
it's harder to read than a replacing the gotos with a simple return ...

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH]:, Juan Quintela
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels, Juan Quintela
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels, Juan Quintela
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH]: c-r4k.c, new gcc's don't like empty labels, Juan Quintela
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]