[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.5] SGI O2 framebuffer driver

To: Ralf Baechle <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5] SGI O2 framebuffer driver
From: Alan Cox <>
Date: 12 Dec 2002 12:44:05 +0000
Cc: Vivien Chappelier <>,, Ilya Volynets <>
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0212120004330.2300-100000@melkor> <> <>
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 02:33, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> The O2 is non-cache coherent.  So with the fairly large write-back second
> level caches enabled frame buffer write could potencially be delayed
> indefinately but in any case quite long.  Frame buffers are usually only

You can flush the frame buffer pages that were touched at the end of an
operation though

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>