[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The 64-bit version of __access_ok is broken.

To: Carsten Langgaard <>
Subject: Re: The 64-bit version of __access_ok is broken.
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:40:30 +0100
Cc: Dominic Sweetman <>, Dominic Sweetman <>,,,
In-reply-to: <>; from on Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:50:55AM +0100
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:50:55AM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:

> I absolutely agree that we should go for an optimized solution, but we discuss
> this issue 1/2 year ago, none of us, had the time to come up with a better fix
> than the one I send. I'm going through my to-do list and came across this
> issue again, and I just wanted to reopen the case again.
> This time it annoyed you enough, so you came up with a better solution and
> I achieved what I came for, so that's great ;-)
> Thanks a lot. I will try you patch right away.

It's already in CVS.

Btw, a missconfigured firewall turned into a heating for the
server room last night.  This should be fixed now.  The machine is now
hosted at MIPS UK, formerly Algorithmics.  There should be no user visible


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>