| To: | ?? <kevin@gv.com.tw> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:35:36 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <00da01c2a047$2aa9f9e0$e20310ac@gv.com.tw>; from kevin@gv.com.tw on Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:25:03PM +0800 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <011c01c29c54$7aa64c60$e20310ac@gv.com.tw> <20021205132358.A5634@linux-mips.org> <00da01c2a047$2aa9f9e0$e20310ac@gv.com.tw> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:25:03PM +0800, ?? wrote: > how to enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE? > > is it enough if i only change > the definition of KERNEL_STACK_SIZE in include/asm-mips/processor.h ? No, other changes would be needed also. HOWEVER: It's a very bad idea. Stacks larger than 8kB require allocation of order 2 or even bigger pages which will make the kernel unreliable. I really recommend to stick with the current 8kB stacks. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE, ?? |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The 64-bit version of __access_ok is broken., Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE, ?? |
| Next by Thread: | [help] exec_usermodehelper() then content of CURRENT is destroyed, ?? |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |