| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: watch exception only for kseg0 addresses..? |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:48:05 +0100 (MET) |
| Cc: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20021204013713.D18419@linux-mips.org> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Correct but I don't know of any CPU that actually uses more than 4 of the > possible 8 sets atm. So we're both right :) Well, software needs to be prepared to handle eight ones. Actually it's easy to handle any number. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: watch exception only for kseg0 addresses..?, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: watch exception only for kseg0 addresses..?, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: watch exception only for kseg0 addresses..?, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | possible Malta 4Kc cache problem ..., Jun Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |