| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | quick question for CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED... |
| From: | "atul srivastava" <atulsrivastava9@rediffmail.com> |
| Date: | 26 Nov 2002 12:17:33 -0000 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Reply-to: | "atul srivastava" <atulsrivastava9@rediffmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hello, In order to confirm a cache problem is it sufficient to set "CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED" , as in so many places functions to operate on cache are called directly while they should under "#ifdef CONFIg_MIPS_UNCACHED" if not technically then atleast for consistent coding practice. I am setting uncached opertion by, change_cp0_config(CONF_CM_CMASK, CONF_CM_UNCACHED);now should the dump_tlb_all() show the "page coherency atributes" for all entries "UNCACHED" anywhere in 4GB space..is it true ?why in my case for some entries it is still showing "Cacheable, noncoherent, write-through, no write allocate" ? Best Regards, Atul |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | O2 Patches, George Gensure |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cli/sti removal from wd33c93.c, Marc Zyngier |
| Previous by Thread: | O2 Patches, George Gensure |
| Next by Thread: | quick question for CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED..., atul srivastava |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |