linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Problems generating shared library for MIPS using binutils-2.13...

To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>, "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@realitydiluted.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problems generating shared library for MIPS using binutils-2.13...
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:33:33 -0800
In-reply-to: <20021105172627.GA5275@nevyn.them.org>; from dan@debian.org on Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:26:27PM -0500
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1021025185639.1121A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <3DC68907.30708@realitydiluted.com> <wvnvg3ct57b.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com> <20021105172627.GA5275@nevyn.them.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:26:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> Surely we can't...  Remember what EF_MIPS_ARCH says: it's actually what
> we call ISA level elsewhere!  I just spent a day beating on this and
> settled for untagged instead of correctly-tagged binaries; I was trying
> to built SB-1 binaries (that's EF_MIPS_MACH of EF_MIPS_MACH_SB1) for a
> 32-bit userland (that's EF_MIPS_ARCH_2).  Not just E_MIPS_ABI_O32, but
> actually -mips2 code.
> 

Have you tried my Linux binutils? If you follow the release note, it
may just work.


H.J.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>