| To: | Bradley Bozarth <bbozarth@cisco.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 64 bit jiffies |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:26:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210222038460.31553-100000@bbozarth-lnx.cisco.com>; from bbozarth@cisco.com on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:42:35PM -0700 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210222038460.31553-100000@bbozarth-lnx.cisco.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:42:35PM -0700, Bradley Bozarth wrote: > There was a thread on lkml in May which resulted in the 32 bit jiffies > value using the bottom of the jiffies_64 - this equivalence being done in > linker scripts. It was stated, however, that MIPS wasn't handled because > it had a funky sed generated linker script for multiple endiannesses. > So is mips currently broken in 2.5? Has anyone looked at this - I would > be willing to figure out a fix but thought I'd see if someone has ideas or > has already dealt with it... This is long fixed in the 2.5 branch of CVS. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] Correct monochrome selection, Geert Uytterhoeven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] Correct monochrome selection, Martin Schulze |
| Previous by Thread: | 64 bit jiffies, Bradley Bozarth |
| Next by Thread: | KSeg0 coherency policy selection., Dinesh Nagpure |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |