| To: | Johannes Stezenbach <js@convergence.de>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Once again: test_and_set for CPUs w/o LL/SC |
| From: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:51:36 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20021007184344.GA17548@convergence.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20020916164034.GA12489@convergence.de> <20021007144749.GB16641@convergence.de> <01fd01c26e1d$add77240$10eca8c0@grendel> <20021007184344.GA17548@convergence.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.1i |
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:43:44PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > The question is how the glibc can detect if > a) the CPU does not have LL/SC > b) the kernel guarantees k1 != MAGIC > > I think the kernel should announce this explicitly. > In my patch from Sep 16 I used a sysctl, but that's > probably bad because glibc would rely on a real new > include/linux/sysctl.h. > > I need some advice on this (maybe add a line to /proc/cpuinfo, > or create a new /proc entry? or add a sysmips call to get > this info?). You should be using an "aux vector"; see how PowerPC provides current glibc with the size of a cache line. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Once again: test_and_set for CPUs w/o LL/SC, Johannes Stezenbach |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | rsync suggestion, Brian Murphy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Once again: test_and_set for CPUs w/o LL/SC, Johannes Stezenbach |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Once again: test_and_set for CPUs w/o LL/SC, Johannes Stezenbach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |