| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:30:49 +0200 |
| Cc: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, Hartvig Ekner <hartvige@mips.com>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no>, Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020905170830.7444E-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:10:51PM +0200 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20020905145954.GA17383@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020905170830.7444E-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:10:51PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > No - the point is that all data types have the same size in N32. It > > was created explicitly as a transitional sop for people who didn't want > > to fix their code, but wanted a performance increase from their 64-bit > > hardware. > > Well, what's the performance increase of n32 over o32? The increased > number of argument registers? I doubt it's noticeable in most cases. That's a minor optimization. More important is the availability of MIPS III/IV and MIPS64 instruction sets which means 64-bit integer registers and 32 64-bit double precission fp registers. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |