| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces |
| From: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:39:13 -0400 |
| Cc: | Hartvig Ekner <hartvige@mips.com>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no>, Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020905182938.7444I-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20020905161933.GA5023@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020905182938.7444I-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.1i |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Right. You don't recompile and get a magic bullet speed improvement > > (well, you do, but not a drastic one I think); but you don't recompile > > and get a magic bullet binary incompatibility either. Then you add > > 64-bit pieces by hand as necessary. > > Huh? I can somewhat understand the "rebuild and forget" approach, > especially in cases suitably experienced stuff was lost meanwhile. But if > you start to fiddle with some old crap, you may equally well run > 's/long/int/' within it, what's a deal. Eh? That's not even sort-of practical on an application of significant size. It would be a nightmare. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |