| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New binutils for kernel |
| From: | "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:10:58 -0700 |
| Cc: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020820165835.B26852@linux-mips.org>; from ralf@linux-mips.org on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:58:35PM +0200 |
| References: | <20020819171238.A7457@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020820161204.8700H-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20020820162959.A26852@linux-mips.org> <20020820145051.GA17311@nevyn.them.org> <20020820165835.B26852@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > So any comments? > > > > Well, I think 2.13's a good idea, but it's very new. I'd say that was > > acceptable as long as you're looking at MIPS64 only, not at MIPS32. > > Such considerations have kept us back at antique levels of binutils. And > juggling with several different versions for userland, and two kernel > flavours is evil ... I have no problems with binutils 2.13.90.0.4 on Linux/mips. I rebuild everything, from kernel to rpms, for Linux/mipsel with it. They seem to run fine. H.J. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Mips cross toolchain, Pete Popov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ADMIN: linux-mips list move, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New binutils for kernel, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New binutils for kernel, Karsten Merker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |