linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New binutils for kernel

To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Subject: Re: New binutils for kernel
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:58:35 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
In-reply-to: <20020820145051.GA17311@nevyn.them.org>; from dan@debian.org on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400
References: <20020819171238.A7457@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020820161204.8700H-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20020820162959.A26852@linux-mips.org> <20020820145051.GA17311@nevyn.them.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> > So any comments?
> 
> Well, I think 2.13's a good idea, but it's very new.  I'd say that was
> acceptable as long as you're looking at MIPS64 only, not at MIPS32. 

Such considerations have kept us back at antique levels of binutils.  And
juggling with several different versions for userland, and two kernel
flavours is evil ...

  Ralf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>