| To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New binutils for kernel |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:58:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020820145051.GA17311@nevyn.them.org>; from dan@debian.org on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400 |
| References: | <20020819171238.A7457@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020820161204.8700H-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20020820162959.A26852@linux-mips.org> <20020820145051.GA17311@nevyn.them.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > So any comments? > > Well, I think 2.13's a good idea, but it's very new. I'd say that was > acceptable as long as you're looking at MIPS64 only, not at MIPS32. Such considerations have kept us back at antique levels of binutils. And juggling with several different versions for userland, and two kernel flavours is evil ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New binutils for kernel, Daniel Jacobowitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New binutils for kernel, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New binutils for kernel, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New binutils for kernel, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |