On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Please accept the patch (from my previous mail). I'm using it now for
> two days, and I've got one mail telling me that it works for its sender.
Ugh, this should be a separate set of functions selected at the run time.
It should be fairly trivial to rewrite it this way (best done with
processor-specific functions expanded from common templates for ease of
maintenance), but the size of the resulting interrupt masking window is
unacceptable. A more finegrained implementation is really desireable,
with an interrupt enable window every page or so, but your proposal should
be fair enough for the sake of usability once rewritten as I suggested.
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
|