On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> You've been a little bit too fast :) I've almost implemented my suggestion
> of moving the probing code into cpu-probe.c.
What's the problem? Now the branch and the trunk are in sync (I just did
a `cp' from the trunk as the missing function was the only difference), so
you may apply the same changes to both. :-) Otherwise you'd have to deal
with the difference.
> > That might be a good idea in principle, but it won't solve the problem
> > anyway. I'd like to see the code for 32-bit processors get annihilated by
> > the compiler if built for mips64. I'll look at it soon. The MIPS32/64
> > crap needs to be fixed here as well.
>
> If you find a nice way of implementing this I certainly won't object.
The MIPS32/64 fix is obvious; the 32-bit CPU is not so, but I have a sort
of an idea. I'd like to get rid of all ifdefs in the area. Not a high
priority, though, sorry.
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
|