| To: | Dominic Sweetman <dom@algor.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mips32_flush_cache routine corrupts CP0_STATUS with gcc-2.96 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Jul 2002 02:24:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, "Gleb O. Raiko" <raiko@niisi.msk.ru>, Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, Jon Burgess <Jon_Burgess@eur.3com.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <15662.3715.334923.669657@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk>; from dom@algor.co.uk on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:02:27AM +0100 |
| References: | <20020711131247.A11700@dea.linux-mips.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020711185642.7876I-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <15662.3715.334923.669657@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:02:27AM +0100, Dominic Sweetman wrote: > PS: my standard appeal. When you say you 'flush' a cache do you mean > invalidate, write-back, or both? If (as I suspect) not all of you > mean the same thing, should you not instead speak of 'invalidate' and > 'writeback'... sloppy language surely leads to sloppy programming? I already had discussions with 68k people about this problem of terminology. It seems there is no unambigous terms for the whole ``cachology'' in the industry. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: mips32_flush_cache routine corrupts CP0_STATUS with gcc-2.96, Dominic Sweetman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Sigcontext->sc_pc Passed to User, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mips32_flush_cache routine corrupts CP0_STATUS with gcc-2.96, Dominic Sweetman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mips32_flush_cache routine corrupts CP0_STATUS with gcc-2.96, Gleb O. Raiko |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |