| To: | jsun@mvista.com (Jun Sun) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] pcnet32.c - tx underflow error |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:16:03 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, ralf@oss.sgi.com (Ralf Baechle), marcelo@conectiva.com.br |
| In-reply-to: | <3D2CCC83.6090304@mvista.com> from "Jun Sun" at Jul 10, 2002 05:08:35 PM |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
> I even suspect this is the default setting on PCI cards on PC. Can someone > verify? If that is the case, that will explain why driver never sets this > bit. Maybe we don't have any "real computers" after all. :-) Most PC hardware can deliver that kind of DMA guarantee. UDMA100 doesn't work very well otherwise. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Malta crashes on the latest 2.4 kernel, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] pcnet32.c - tx underflow error, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] pcnet32.c - tx underflow error, Jun Sun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] pcnet32.c - tx underflow error, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |