| To: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:34:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <3D29CA34.1050306@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:21:56AM -0700 |
| References: | <20020702114045.A16197@lucon.org> <20020702220651.B9566@dea.linux-mips.net> <00d401c22337$7e731580$10eca8c0@grendel> <20020704155726.A28268@dea.linux-mips.net> <3D29CA34.1050306@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:21:56AM -0700, Jun Sun wrote: > > No, Sony's ABI isn't MP proof and will break silently on MP systems. As > > such I can't consider it anything else but a hack. sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET, > > ...) and ll/sc however are MP proof. > > > > > sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET, ...) as it is is not MP-safe. Two processors can > set the variable at the same time since no spinlock is used to protect the > access. Note there are two cases in the code, one using ll/sc which is MP proof and a second implementation for machines that don't have these instructions. At least for now Linux/MIPS SMP systems by definition have ll/sc, so I don't see any problem. > This is also a problem when I was writing preemptiable kernel patch. Thanks for the reminder. I'm just working on the merge with 2.5.4 which has all the preemption stuff. Another one for the to-do list ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LTP testing (shmat01), Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips, Jun Sun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips, Ulrich Drepper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |