| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips |
| From: | "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:04:51 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020702220651.B9566@dea.linux-mips.net>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:06:51PM +0200 |
| References: | <20020702114045.A16197@lucon.org> <20020702220651.B9566@dea.linux-mips.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:06:51PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:40:45AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > The ll/sc emulation is implemented in 2.4.0 and above. This patch makes > > glibc always use ll/sc. > > Which means the overhead of two syscalls instead of one sysmips() call > for something that is assumed to be dirt cheap. R3000, R5900 etc. > users won't this patch you, which'll have significant impact on their > glibc performance. > Not all ll/sc usages are implemented with sysmips. Does mips care about those? In case of libstdc++, should mips use ll/sc emulation? H.J. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | patch for little problems, Yoichi Yuasa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Always use ll/sc for mips, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |