| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sys_syscall patch. |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:45:49 +0200 |
| Cc: | Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020624133501.22509K-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:38:27PM +0200 |
| References: | <3D16F891.78A333BA@mips.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020624133501.22509K-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:38:27PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > What programs btw are using syscall()? To be honest I don't recall one > > > ... > > > > /sbin/rpc.lockd. > > It use syscall() to indirectly call the 'sys_nfsservctl' syscall, why it > > doesn't do the syscall directly is beyond me. > > Hmm, shouldn't syscall() be a library wrapper? I think we should kill > sys_syscall(). It's in the kernel for no better reason than Risc/OS and IRIX having this syscall. Also the glibc syscall implementation was historically broken wrt. syscall restarting and a few other subtilities. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sys_syscall patch., Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sys_syscall patch., Kevin D. Kissell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sys_syscall patch., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sys_syscall patch., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |