Re: 3 questions about linux-2.4.18 and R3000

[Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>]

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 01:11:18AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 
> > > Wonderful.  Due to the hackish way we're using to build 64-bit kernels
> > > for the currently supported targets we don't run into this problems,
> > > there are no R_MIPS_HIGHEST relocs ever.
> > 
> > Well, for my I2 Impact I do. :-) I hope to get it running again with
> > the current kernel (plus my patches) in the next days.
> 
> Interesting.  So you don't place the kernel into any of the 32-bit
> compatibility address spaces on that machine?

Load address is 0xa800000020002000 (and my diff against CVS > 300k). :-)
I'm busy because of Linuxtag now, I think I have time to provide some
parts of this in about two weeks.


Thiemo