linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3 questions about linux-2.4.18 and R3000

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 3 questions about linux-2.4.18 and R3000
From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 01:53:11 +0200
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, "Gleb O. Raiko" <raiko@niisi.msk.ru>, Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, Alexandr Andreev <andreev@niisi.msk.ru>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20020603161518.B28859@dea.linux-mips.net>
References: <20020603015536.B2832@dea.linux-mips.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020603202021.14451K-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20020603154011.A11393@dea.linux-mips.net> <20020603230107.GH23411@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20020603160425.A28859@dea.linux-mips.net> <20020603231118.GI23411@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20020603161518.B28859@dea.linux-mips.net>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 01:11:18AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 
> > > Wonderful.  Due to the hackish way we're using to build 64-bit kernels
> > > for the currently supported targets we don't run into this problems,
> > > there are no R_MIPS_HIGHEST relocs ever.
> > 
> > Well, for my I2 Impact I do. :-) I hope to get it running again with
> > the current kernel (plus my patches) in the next days.
> 
> Interesting.  So you don't place the kernel into any of the 32-bit
> compatibility address spaces on that machine?

Load address is 0xa800000020002000 (and my diff against CVS > 300k). :-)
I'm busy because of Linuxtag now, I think I have time to provide some
parts of this in about two weeks.


Thiemo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>