linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New platforms

To: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>
Subject: Re: New platforms
From: Ilya <ilya@theIlya.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 15:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, Brian Murphy <brian@murphy.dk>, linux-mips <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10205301513510.12679-100000@www.transvirtual.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 30 May 2002, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > PS: I dont like this split up tree - Currently Ralf is the one
> > feeding mainstream so please stop this diversification of the trees
> > as the normal user gets completely confused which makes linux mips
> > a VERY BAD target and does not help any popularity for the mips targets.
> > We had the linux-vr desaster before which helped nothing but in
> > the end bound developer efforts which were useless in the end.
>
> True. The problem is the slow migration to Linus tree and the slow
> migration into the OSS tree.
You can always pos your patches to the list, and whatever didn't make it
into the tree, can be picked up from there by interested parties.

> Here is a suggestion, how about using the BK
> tree at bkbits.net. There is a mips tree there but it has never been used.
> The question is who is the admin of that tree so we can have access ?
Are you saing "let's make yet another tree"? Ugh...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE89qj484S94bALfyURAufLAJ9s0E5CSZllyEq4wFcTgogaBra38QCgpntH
CjYS1mv/lzI9xnTS3NspGoM=
=UBYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>