Re: Function pointers and #defines

["Justin Carlson" <justinca@cs.cmu.edu>]

On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 12:50, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > but the latter is both clearer and shorter.  Is there some deep,
> > mystical C reason that we use the former, or did someone do it that way
> > a long time ago and no one has changed it?
> 
> At a guess, this prevents taking the address of the function
> unintentionally...

But if you're writing code in such a way that the compiler type checking
doesn't flag this, you deserve what you get.  (IMHO, of course.  :)

-Justin