| To: | Justin Carlson <justinca@cs.cmu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: __flush_cache_all() miscellany |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 May 2002 16:24:37 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, ralf@oss.sgi.com |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020529222325.17584N-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <1022713145.7644.363.camel@ldt-sj3-022.sj.broadcom.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1) Gecko/20010901 |
Justin Carlson wrote: I'm still looking for a reason for the existence of __flush_cache_all(). It is needed by kgdb where gdb client may modify several instructions before a 'c' command is issued. In that case, you cannot use flush_icache_range because you don't know the range. It is probably not safe either as the data cache may not be written back yet Does flush_icache_range() mandates write-back of dcache in the same range? If it does, you might be able to get away with flush_icache_range(ICACHE_BEGIN, ICACHE_END). Like someone else has pointed out, __flush_cache_all() is introduced to ensure i-cache/d-cache consistency. I remember it was shortly introduced after we had the first cache-coherent system where flush_cache_all() is a null function. Jun |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: __flush_cache_all() miscellany, Justin Carlson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New platforms, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: __flush_cache_all() miscellany, Justin Carlson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: __flush_cache_all() miscellany, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |