| To: | Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: what is the right behavior of copy_to_user(0x0, ..., ...)? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 May 2002 01:53:13 +0800 |
| Cc: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, linux-mips <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <3CD794BC.43264E9E@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:47:56AM +0200 |
| References: | <3CD3052B.1050400@mvista.com> <20020503162337.A27366@dea.linux-mips.net> <3CD32044.9040109@mvista.com> <20020503184000.A1238@dea.linux-mips.net> <3CD794BC.43264E9E@mips.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Carsten Langgaard wrote: > It fix a problem I have had for quite a while in the r4k_fpu.S. The code in > question is: > jr ra > .set nomacro > EX(sw t0,SC_FPC_EIR(a0)) > .set macro > > I have fixed it locally by removing the SW from the delay-slot, but obviously > your fix is the right one. > But I guess we need the same fix in arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c. Good spotting. I'll use a slightly different fix using the new inline function exception_epc() in <asm/branch.h> to implement that slightly more elegant. Thanks, Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: what is the right behavior of copy_to_user(0x0, ..., ...)?, Carsten Langgaard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RM200 big endian prom ?, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: what is the right behavior of copy_to_user(0x0, ..., ...)?, Carsten Langgaard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: what is the right behavior of copy_to_user(0x0, ..., ...)?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |