| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd |
| From: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:14:49 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020415201017.19735Q-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:13:42PM +0200 |
| Mail-followup-to: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| References: | <20020415181743.A24174@gandalf.physik.uni-konstanz.de> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020415201017.19735Q-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Guido Guenther wrote: > > > Are you telling me the only reason for the changes in > > init_task.c/head.S > > were made to break the elf2ecoff/addinitrd "hack"? Where exactly was > > there a hack in head.S/init_task.c. Please point me to the line of > > code > > since I don't understand enough about the kernel to see it. > > I meant it stopped working because it is an ugly hack. It is too > fragile > to work in all cases. I admit it's fragile but I'm still puzzled why the changes broke it and if we can revert those changes on the linux_2_4 branch. -- Guido |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rm7k flush_icache_line() in rm7k_dma_cache_*, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Patch SR71K support - questions, Louis Hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | [patch]: minor addinitrd.c cleanup, Guido Guenther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |