| To: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:13:42 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20020415181743.A24174@gandalf.physik.uni-konstanz.de> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Guido Guenther wrote: > Are you telling me the only reason for the changes in init_task.c/head.S > were made to break the elf2ecoff/addinitrd "hack"? Where exactly was > there a hack in head.S/init_task.c. Please point me to the line of code > since I don't understand enough about the kernel to see it. I meant it stopped working because it is an ugly hack. It is too fragile to work in all cases. > That's 2.5 stuff. We should not break expected behavior in 2.4. Agreed. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd, Guido Guenther |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | rm7k flush_icache_line() in rm7k_dma_cache_*, William Jhun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd, Guido Guenther |
| Next by Thread: | Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd, Guido Guenther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |