| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Compressed images? |
| From: | Geoffrey Espin <espin@idiom.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:19:31 -0800 |
| Cc: | William Jhun <wjhun@ayrnetworks.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20020304145709.A1332@oss.sgi.com>; from Ralf Baechle on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:57:09PM -0800 |
| References: | <20020304120803.A1247@ayrnetworks.com> <20020304145709.A1332@oss.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:57:09PM -0800, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Right now we've got more > than half a dozen variations of code to support compressed images throughout > the kernel. So I'm not going to accept any new patches for compressed > images before this mess has been cleaned. Volunteers :-) Do you mean just the 'ad hoc' MIPS schemes, or across the whole gamut of Linux architectures? The problem isn't so much the compression mechanics, but the BSP/LSP. It would be helpful if there was one architecture that was considered the 'ideal'. Though I haven't actually used it: arch/ppc/boot appears very flexible, and adheres to a strict layout and naming convention. Geoff -- Geoffrey Espin espin@idiom.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Compressed images?, William Jhun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Compressed images?, Geoffrey Espin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Compressed images?, Geoffrey Espin |
| Next by Thread: | Console problem, Andre . Messerschmidt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |