| To: | Jay Carlson <nop@nop.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:22:31 +0100 |
| Cc: | Hartvig Ekner <hartvige@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <E0CB6130-2AC8-11D6-AB38-0030658AB11E@nop.com>; from nop@nop.com on Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:55:30AM -0500 |
| References: | <20020226125532.B7497@dea.linux-mips.net> <E0CB6130-2AC8-11D6-AB38-0030658AB11E@nop.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:55:30AM -0500, Jay Carlson wrote: > Right. In my ideal world, here's how it would work: > > cc1 defaults to -G0. I think we have that now. > > gas defaults to -G0. Messing with SUBTARGET_ASM_SPEC has that effect > for people who use the gcc driver, but anybody invoking gas directly > will still hit this problem, but too bad. > > So I think the primary constituency for gas defaulting to -G8 are > existing cygnuhhhh I mean redhat embedded MIPS customers, outside of > Linux; that's who we should check with before we change the default. So far we've been following the MIPS-UNIX tradition more than anything else. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Problem Cross compiling simple test program, Wayne Gowcher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Is this a toolchain bug?, Matthew Dharm |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc?, Jay Carlson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc?, Hartvig Ekner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |