| To: | ralf@oss.sgi.com (Ralf Baechle) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc? |
| From: | Hartvig Ekner <hartvige@mips.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:21:00 +0100 (MET) |
| Cc: | js@convergence.de (Johannes Stezenbach), hartvige@mips.com (Hartvig Ekner), linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20020225193928.A4385@dea.linux-mips.net> from "Ralf Baechle" at Feb 25, 2002 07:39:28 PM |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
Ralf Baechle writes: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:31:41PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > BTW: Who is "we"? Do you mean global data optimization is broken > > in gcc/binutils or just that no one at SGI is using it? > > It's an ECOFF specific optimization that just has been forward ported into > the ELF world. And what does this have to do with SGI anyway? I still don't get it. Why would one not use GP optimization with non-shared non-PIC code? It certainly is used throughout in the non-Linux MIPS world, and on the limited testing I did today it also worked fine. Is there something which is known not to work, or some conflict somewhere which prevents the general use of GP? /Hartvig |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | MIPS, i8259 and spurious interrupts., Scott A McConnell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc?, Johannes Stezenbach |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Setting up of GP in static, non-PIC version of glibc?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |