On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:05:21PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> If it works as I think it does, then is the code in
> linux/arch/mips/gt64120/momenco_ocelot/setup.c correct? Specifically,
> it calls ioremap() and then calls set_io_port_base() with a very
> strange value -- it's the value from ioremap()
> modified by the I/O physical address base...
I was reading too fast and missed that part.
> That doesn't look right to me... or I just don't quite understand how
> this is supposed to work.
That's definately looks fishy. Another crime people keep comitting is using
the same address space for both I/O memory and the base address of the