linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ip22 watchdog timer

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: ip22 watchdog timer
From: Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:33:05 -0500
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20020215152132.A602@dea.linux-mips.net>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:21:32PM +0100
References: <20020215130613.A301@gandalf.physik.uni-konstanz.de> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020215150825.29773K-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20020215152132.A602@dea.linux-mips.net>
Reply-to: jim@jtan.com
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
> >  BTW, why do people insist on sending patches as attachments -- it makes
> > commenting them helly twisted, sigh... 
> 
> How true.  MIME - broken solution for a broken design ;)  More serious,
> MIME makes sense when using a MUA that garbles patches like Netscape or
> certain versions of Pine.
> 
>   Ralf  (Prolly still be using Mutt + vi in 5 years ...)

Patches as attachments are actually really convenient with Mutt.
You can view them seperately, extract and save them easily, etc.

To comment on both the original message and the attachments: use
view-attachments (v), use tag-entry (t) on all of the parts you want
quoted in your reply, and then use tag-prefix & reply (;r) 
(or ;g or whatever).

But I digress :)

-jim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>